A Growing Demand for Thin FBGs in Sensing Applications

Reinforced FBG Sensors News
Reinforced FBG Sensors Serve Demanding Applications
September 22, 2016
Growing Demand for Thin FBGs News
SPIE Photonics West 2017
January 5, 2017
Growing Demand for Thin FBGs News

Kevin Hsu, Andrei Csipkes, and Tommy Jin
Technica Optical Components
3657 Peachtree Rd, Suite 10A, Atlanta, 30319, USA,
info@technicasa.com, www.technicasa.com

Click here to download the paper

For many advanced embedded-FBG sensing applications it has become necessary and critical that the sensing fibers have small dimension, light weight, and low bend sensitivity in order to allow easy embedding with minimal compromise on the strength of the host materials. Specifically, fiber-optic sensing applications typically use a standard single-mode fiber (SMF) where the core/clad/coating diameters are ~8/125/250 μm. However, when the standard SMF sensors are embedded inside composite materials, the mechanical performance of the composites could be compromised due to local stress concentration.

Driven by increasing demands in mechanical testing and structural health monitoring (SHM) purposes, small-diameter (thin) SMFs have been developed in order to decrease the size mismatch between embedded FBG sensors and the composites. This development was pioneered by Takeda et.al. and Hitachi Cable [1], and has now become particularly useful for applications not only in the aerospace industry but also in robotics, medical devices, and micro-mechanics. Fig.1 illustrates a visual comparison between a standard 125 μm cladding diameter SMF and a thin fiber of 40/52 μm cladding/polyimide-coated diameter embedded in carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminates. Applications of thin FBG sensors with cladding diameters ranging from 40 to 50 um have been investigated theoretically and experimentally [2-13]. It was shown that the thin FBG sensors are less intrusive at stress heterogeneities, and exhibit linear strain and temperature responses with sensitivity coefficients almost the same as those of the standard-diameter FBG sensors. Studies have also shown that FBGs in small-diameter fibers experienced slightly less induced birefringence than those in standard fibers for the same embedding conditions [8,9]. The intensive development of thin FBG sensing in composites in the aerospace industry [14,15] has advanced to the realization of autonomous sensing-healing systems [16] and a recent successful demonstration of large-scale SHM of a composite aircraft wing [17].

Fig.1. Standard SMF (left) and thin optical fiber cross-section embedded in a CFRP lamina [1].

To meet the growing needs of thin FBG sensors for advancing SHM in composite materials and a variety of other applications, Technica has developed thin single-mode fiber-based FBG sensors (T60) for a wide range of optical specifications and coating requirements (Figs.2-4). Fabricated directly in bare fiber and coated with acrylate, polyimide, or metal, these sensors are ultra-small and durable for use in tight spaces with minimal intrusion. When metalized (most commonly with Au), these FBGs can be encapsulated into hermetically sealed devices as well. The small-diameter fibers containing these FBGs have correspondingly smaller core, higher NA and higher cut-off wavelengths to significantly reduce macro-bending sensitivity. Table-1 presents the results of bend-loss measurements of the 50 mm and 80 mm cladding diameter SMFs. Indeed it is impressive that even at a bend diameter of 0.9 mm the loss is very low.

Fig.2. Optical fiber cross-section.


Fig.3. Thin fiber options for acrylate coat fiber.


Fig.4. Thin fiber options for polyimide or metal coated fibers.

Thin Fiber Type 3 mm Coil Diameter 0.9 mm Coil Diameter
5 Turns: Measured 1 Turn: Average 5 Turns: Measured 1 Turn: Average
50 mm

cladding SMF

Negligible loss Negligible loss 0.5 dB 0.1 dB
80 mm

cladding SMF

0.1 dB Negligible loss 0.6 dB 0.12 dB

Table.1. Thin fiber bend-loss measurements.

These thin FBG sensors yield excellent wavelength to temperature and wavelength to strain linearity. Their small-size and fast response time make them useful and uniquely fitting for in-process control of advanced composites manufacturing and real-time monitoring of high performance vehicles for space, air, water and land. New applications are emerging in energy, medical, and robotic sectors.

The T60 FBG is designed to make handling and installation fast, easy and intuitive. It delivers the many advantages inherent to all FBG based sensors. Equally sensitive compared to most traditional strain and temperature sensors but immune to electromagnetic interference (EMI). The precise FBG structure written into these specialty fibers’ core in producing the T60 yields a simple transducer configuration of high resolution, linearity, and measurement repeatability, as well as high side-lobe suppression ratio (SLSR) for clear signal processing (Fig.5). As the T60 sensors can be provided in arrays of various lengths and with a flexible number of FBGs, they are well suited for projects that require high-density and large-scale monitoring. Additionally, splicing techniques for connecting the thin fibers with normal SMF28-compatible fibers also exit to facilitate further processing and system integration.

The T60 is a rugged low-cost FBG with stable operation for highly accurate long-term use, and have been field-proven in many customers’ applications worldwide. Table-2 below lists the typical range of available performance parameters of the T60 thin FBG sensors.

In addition to SHM in composite materials, there are new and exciting applications that can benefit from the thin FBG sensing technology, including shape sensing development in continuum robots [18], embedded sensing in 3D printed structures [19], and touch/force/shape sensing in medical robotics [20].



[1] K. Satori, et al., “Polyimide-coated small-diameter optical fiber sensors for embedding in composite laminate structures,” Proc. SPIE, v.4328, Smart Structures and Materials, pp.285–294 (2001).
[2] K. Satori, et al., “Development of small-diameter optical fiber sensors for damage detection in composite laminates,” Proc. SPIE v.3986, Smart Structures and Materials, pp.104–111 (2000).
[3] S. Takeda, et al., “Delamination detection in CFRP laminates with embedded small-diameter fiber Bragg grating sensors,” Composites: Part A, v.33(7), pp.971–980 (2002).
[4] Y. Okabe, et al., “Detection of microscopic damages in composite laminates with embedded small-diameter fiber Bragg grating sensors,” Composites Science and Technology, v.62(2), pp.951–958 (2002).
[5] Y. Okabe, et al., “Effect of thermal residual stress on the reflection spectrum from fiber Bragg grating sensors embedded in CFRP laminates,” Composites: Part A, v.33(7), pp.991–999 (2002).
[6] P. Lesiak, et al., “Influence of lamination process on optical fiber sensors embedded in composite material,” Measurement, v.45 (9), pp.2275–2280 (2012).
[7] R.M. Liu and D.K. Liang, “Experimental study of carbon fiber reinforced plastic with embedded optical fibers,” Materials and Design, v.31(2), pp.994–998 (2010).
[8] S. Kabashima, et al., “Damage detection of satellite structures by optical fiber with small diameter,” Proc. SPIE, v.3985, pp.343–351 (2000).
[9] D. Coric, et al., “Distributed strain measurements using fiber Bragg gratings in small-diameter optical fiber and low coherence reflectometry,” Optics Express, v.18(25), pp.26484–26491 (2010).
[10] S. Takeda, et al., “Delamination monitoring of laminated composites subjected to low-velocity impact using small-diameter FBG sensor,” Composites: Part A, v.36, pp.903–908 (2005).
[11] S. Takeda, et al., “Detection of edge delamination in CFRP laminates under cyclic loading using small diameter FBG sensors,” Composites Science and Technology, v.63(13), pp.1885–1894 (2003).
[12] R-M Liu, et al., “Small diameter fiber Bragg gratings and applications,” Measurement, v.46(9), pp.3440–3448 (2013).
[13] S. Komatsuzaki, et al., “Embedded FBG sensors and AWG-based wavelength interrogator for health monitoring of composite materials,” 16th International Conference on Composite Materials (2007).
[14] N. Takeda and Y. Okabe, “Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors in Aeronautics and Astronautics,” Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors: Recent Advancements, Industrial Applications and Market Exploitation, pp.171-184 (2011).
[15] R. di Sante, “Fibre optic sensors for structural health monitoring of aircraft composite structures: Recent Advances and Applications,” Sensors, v.15, pp.18666-18713 (2015).
[16] S. Minakuchi et al., “Hierarchical system for autonomous sensing-healing of delamination in large-scale composite structures”, Smart Materials and Structures, v.23, p.115014 (2014).
[17] M.J. Nicolas, et al., “Large scale applications using FBG sensors: determination of in-flight loads and shape of a composite aircraft wing,” Aerospace, v.3(18) (2016).
[18] S.C. Ryu and P.E. Dupont, “FBG-based shape sensing tubes for continuum robots” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China (2014).
[19] Y.K. Lin et al., “Using three-dimensional printing technology to produce a novel fiber Bragg grating pressure sensor,” Sensor and Materials, v.28(5), pp.389-394 (2016).
[20] Y. L. Park, Soft Robotics and Bionics Lab. Carnegie Mellon University (http://softrobotics.cs.cmu.edu).


For brief tutorial about Fiber Bragg Gratings, please visit:

Leave a Reply